Fẹ́mi Akínṣọlá
In the early decades of the 21st century, Africa has witnessed a troubling resurgence of military coups. From recent developments in the Benin Republic—where a coup attempt occurred, albeit unsuccessfully—to earlier upheavals in Mali, Guinea, and Chad, these events signal a disturbing trend that must be urgently addressed. The frequency of these coups undermines democratic progress and sends a grim message regarding governance, stability, and the rule of law across the continent.
The economic impacts of these coups are significant. Each coup creates uncertainty that deters both foreign and domestic investment. Investors hesitate to commit resources in countries where the political landscape is unstable, leading to an immediate decline in economic activity. The case of Gabon, which experienced a coup in August 2023, illustrates this problem. After the coup, foreign direct investment plummeted as companies sought safer environments for their capital. Additionally, economic disruptions can lead to inflation, job losses, and reductions in essential services, exacerbating poverty and inequality. This cycle of economic instability breeds discontent, increasing the likelihood of future coups.
Addressing the economic factors that contribute to coups is crucial. Structural reforms aimed at poverty alleviation, enhancing educational opportunities, and ensuring access to basic healthcare are necessary. Investments in primary and secondary education can equip citizens with the skills needed for participation in a modern economy. Vocational training programmes targeting youth unemployment can further reduce civil unrest. Basic healthcare access can mitigate social grievances and improve community health, enhancing overall productivity. Job creation initiatives, especially in agriculture, technology, and renewable energy, can provide sustainable employment. Supporting small and medium-sized enterprises is also important, as they often serve as the backbone of local economies. Implementing fair taxation can help redistribute wealth, funding public services that benefit a wider population.
When citizens’ basic needs are met, they are less likely to resort to political violence. Creating a more equitable distribution of resources can alleviate frustrations that often lead to coup attempts. Economic empowerment directly correlates with reduced coup attempts, as satisfied citizens are less inclined to support military takeovers.
However, the recurring theme of military coups also indicates dissatisfaction with elected leaders who fail to deliver on their promises or who cling to power illegitimately. For instance, Burkina Faso experienced coups in January and September 2022, showcasing a cycle of political instability that undermines faith in democracy. This situation creates a sense of hopelessness among citizens—if democratic systems cannot guarantee stability, military intervention may seem a valid option. The poor performance of past military regimes demonstrates that they often struggle to improve living conditions for citizens and can lead to widespread suffering. The military’s role should primarily involve national defence, not managing complex civilian affairs.
African countries must take the necessary steps to curtail this resurgence of military coups. Leaders should handle sensitive matters with the utmost care, prioritising the welfare of their citizens over projects that do not enhance their lives. This focus is crucial for maintaining political stability and ensuring that citizens receive better living standards.
Furthermore, it’s essential to issue a strong warning to those who advocate for military takeovers and wars. History clearly shows that such paths only contribute to the backwardness of African nations. Every call for military intervention or upheaval must be approached with wisdom, as the past has taught us that these actions lead to cycles of violence and instability that have detrimental effects on citizen welfare. We should strive to resolve African problems and disputes with African solutions, fostering unity and cooperation among nations to forge a path towards sustainable development.
The impact of foreign arms sales on coup frequency cannot be understated. The proliferation of weapons to unstable regions often emboldens military leaders and factions seeking to overturn democratically elected governments. External powers supplying arms to autocratic regimes destabilise these nations and create environments conducive to coups. This often occurs in countries with weak governmental capacity, allowing military factions to exploit situations and leading to increased violence.
The role of regional bodies like the African Union (AU) and the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) is vital in deterring future military takeovers. Establishing frameworks for intervention when democracy is threatened is essential. ECOWAS’s principle of non-indifference, which advocates for the protection of democracy, should be enforced rigorously. Imposing sanctions, offering diplomatic isolation, and providing stronger support for democratic forces can create a deterrent effect.
Civil society organisations (CSOs) can effectively advocate against military takeovers. They can foster democratic engagement and raise awareness about the dangers of military rule. By organising campaigns that educate citizens about their rights, CSOs can galvanise public opinion to reject coups and promote peaceful political discourse. These organisations can also oversee government acts and hold elected officials accountable, thereby strengthening democratic institutions.
External actors, including foreign governments and multinational corporations, must be scrutinised for their influence over African coups. Their involvement can create instability that disrupts democratic processes. Supporting dictators undermines the efforts of those advocating for democracy and human rights. Recognising the interconnections between local grievances and international dynamics is crucial for developing effective strategies.
The implications of these coups extend well beyond immediate political consequences. Each coup erodes trust in democratic institutions and undermines civil society. Citizens become disillusioned as military leaders prioritise power over public welfare. In this cycle of power grabs, opportunities for reform diminish, and human rights advancements are jeopardised.
The international community must acknowledge this troubling trend and its far-reaching consequences. The prevalence of coups sends negative signals to potential investors and partners. Stability is vital for economic development, and with each coup, growth prospects decrease. Furthermore, the geopolitical landscape may become more complex, as regional powers might exploit chaos for their interests. This situation underscores the necessity to condemn military coups, as they dismantle years of progress towards peace, stability, and development.
In conclusion, addressing the root causes of these coups requires a multifaceted approach. The legacy of colonial rule has left many countries with fragile political systems, while insufficient accountability creates an environment where military intervention appears appealing. By engaging citizens through education about civic responsibility, African countries can foster cultures that value participation over violence. Empowering civil society organisations to advocate for democratic principles can build resilience against future military takeovers. Establishing legal frameworks prohibiting military intervention in politics can further deter coups. The recent attempted coup in the Benin Republic, despite failing, serves as a warning signal that cannot be ignored. As these events unfold, it is vital for leaders, citizens, and the global community to engage in meaningful dialogue regarding governance and stability. Only through collaborative efforts can we hope to address this political disease and pave the way for a brighter, more stable Africa, where the military’s role remains firmly rooted in defence rather than governance.
Copyright © 2025 Fẹ́mi Akínṣọlá. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the author.
